`, no `n24-wrap`, no intro paragraph, no snapshot cards, no FAQ, and no blockquotes exist.
– **Gate 3 (claim = source):** No claim has a usable URL. The plan’s key claims cite only “SERP-tulos N,” and the retrieved sources are unrelated.
– **Gate 4 (fact lock):** `verified_facts` is empty, so there is nothing to lock against.
– **Gate 5 (FAQ):** No FAQ items exist, and the minimum is 5.
– **Gate 6 (links):** No external citations exist. The contract requires at least 10 URLs across 6 domains, and none are usable.
– **Gate 7 (JSON-LD):** Nothing to overwrite, and no valid canonical URL exists.
– **Gate 12 (UX structure):** The required comparison table, steps, and callouts cannot be populated from sourced content.
– **Gate 14 (editorial voice):** No sourced facts exist to anchor the stance, table lead-ins, or verdicts.

Ala missa naita

4 liittyvaa artikkelia

Repairing this would require inventing knot instructions, URLs, or source attributions, which the rules prohibit. The internal link dataset also rules out both suggested links.

To proceed, the pipeline needs a new research pass that returns:

1. Tier 1 or Tier 2 sources on fishing knots, with verified URLs and publisher names (line manufacturers, angling associations, extension or university publications, or established angling magazines).
2. Claims tied to those sources, especially for the Palomar, uni, and modified-improved-clinch knots on braided and fluorocarbon line, plus any tested slip-resistance or breaking-strength figures.
3. At least 10 usable URLs across at least 6 domains, with dates where available.

Once that research exists, rerun P2 to draft the article, then send its HTML through this validator. I’d also drop the “Hakumäärä: UNKNOWN” stats entry, since it adds nothing for readers.